literarydiscussions.myfreeforum.org

Sitaram · Site Admin Joined: 14 Sep 2005 Posts: 1079

When we are wronged, we demand justice. When we are harmed, we cry
out for mercy. No one doubts or denies the existence and reality of such
qualities as justice or mercy or love. Yet such qualities cannot be seen,
but exist only in the context of living human consciousness and discourse.
There is one verse in Scripture which states: "God is love."

(I Jn 4:8. 8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. )

Yet, we are not satisfied with the notion that God is merely a
personification of Love or Mercy or Justice. We yearn for a real, palpable,
detectable, provable, demonstrable, existent, personal God who will relate
to us as an individual.

If God is the source of being and non-being, and therefore prior to being
and non-being, then what would it mean to say that God "exists"? If God
is prior to good and evil, then what would it mean to say that God is
"good"? We do not realize that by such language we actually demean God
because we cast God conceptually into His own created realm of dualities
and antinomies.

We cannot really prove to anyone else that the Universe exists, yet we do
not doubt the universe because of that lack of proof, since we may touch
and see and feel the universe with our senses. We tend to seek the
sacred within sense perception itself.

Schopenhauer can be credited with one of the most famous opening lines
of philosophy: “The world is my representation” [§1, p.3].

Schopenhauer begins one of his chapters in "World as Will and
Representation" by pointing out that the swirling gases of outer space
produced countless revolving and orbiting stars and planets and that upon
the surface of at least one of those planets, a film or layer of water and
soil formed which evolved first animal consciousness, and later human
consciousness and speech, and that it is only within the context of that
human consciousness and discursive speech that such notions as truth
and goodness and evil abide.

The harsh vacuum of outer space may appear as an evil to biological life,
which requires atmosphere and moisture and gravity in order to survive,
yet such a seemingly inimical void of outer space is a nurturing womb for
an evolving nebula or galaxy.

Consider the atmosphere of an ordinary room, a living room or parlour, in
which we are comfortably seated. If a scientist were to place the
atmosphere of that room in a centrifuge, we would discover that the
comfortable room-temperature air is actually composed of a minority of
very high energy molecules and also a minority of very low energy
molecules. When that minority of high energy molecules are segregated
by the centrifuge and concentrated into one small area, they form a heat
which is hot enough to injure us, while the minority of low energy
molecules segregated and concentrated in a small area, form a freezing
cold intense enough to cause us discomfort.

Imagine, if good and evil were analogous to those high and low energy
molecules in the atmosphere. A certain balanced measure of both
constitute a normal atmosphere while an imbalance creates a moral
dilemma.

I am very fond of an old saying from India: "The cow and the bee and the
viper all drink the same water from a pond, and yet the cow transforms
that water into soothing milk, while the bee transforms the very same
water into honey, yet the viper transforms the water into a deadly
poisonous venom." How may we see molecules of good and evil in the
water which surrounds us, and in what manner do we personally
transform the world around us as we pass through this life?

We often ignore the fact that ideas themselves are as palpably existent as
matter and sense perception. We must bear in mind that the very IDEA
of Christ's life as described in the Gospels, the very IDEA, notion concept
that God should take human birth and lead such a life of humility,
obedience, subjugation and surrender, that very IDEA ITSELF is
potentially sanctifying and transformational for those who embrace it and
internalize it and imitate it and become confirmed in it, quite APART from
the issue of the truth or falsehood of the Gospel accounts or the actual
historical Jesus.

We may doubt or deny the existence of God if we so choose, but we
cannot doubt or deny the existence of such ideas as the life of Christ, and
the changes which such ideas have wrought in the world and in individual
lives during the past two millenia.

Einstein once pointed out, in a tribute to Gandhi, that generations hence,
people might well read accounts of Gandhi's life and scarcely believe that
such a person actually walked the earth in the flesh. Carl Sandberg has
eulogized and lionized the life of Abraham Lincoln in several volumes with
such flower speech that it becomes difficult for the reader to separate the
real person of Lincoln from the legend of Lincoln. But the fact remains that
such personalities as Gandhi and Lincoln did walk the earth in the flesh
and the IDEA of their lives CONTINUES to walk the earth in the pages of
books and in our imaginations, and that IDEA of their lives continues to
inspire and transform the live of future generations.

There is a wonderful Roman Catholic scholar by the name of Boadt who
wrote a large book on the study of the Old Testament. I was able to meet
him once, briefly, after a lecture, some years ago. I was recently
mistaken in my recollection that it was in one of the early chapters of that
work that Boadt quotes a thought-provoking passage from Deuteronomy.

No, I am mistaken about Boadt and Deuteronomy. I actually read the
passage in a book by George Martin entitled "Reading Scripture as the
Word of God" (ISBN 1-56955-061-1) and the passage is from Isaiah,
Chapter 55, and not from Deuteronomy.

Isaiah 55:10-11 "For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven,
and do not return there until they have watered the earth, making it bring
forth and sprout, giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater, so shall
my word be that goes out from my mouth; it shall not return to me
empty, but it shall accomplish that which I purpose, and succeed in the
thing for which I sent it."

This passage raises an interesting thought with regard to some things
which Moses Maimonides writes in his famous work, "Guide for the
Perplexed."

Moses Maimonides is considered to be one of the greatest Rabbinical
writers of all times. Maimonides died a mere twenty years before the birth
of Thomas Aquinas. In some sense, Aquinas may have been attempting
with his writing of the Summa Theologica to accomplish for Christianity
what Maimonides had accomplished for Judaism in systematizing matters
of faith and interpretation.

Maimonides, in the very middle of his "Guide for the Perplexed",
emphatically states that God does not intervene in ordinary matters of
cause and effect, the causal nexus, in the universe. Maimonides gives the
amusing example of a man who spits, and the spit startles a frog, who
jumps and splashes, causing a bird to take flight which in turn causes an
archer to take aim, fire, and miss, accidentally slaying some innocent
bystander. This example which I give may not be verbatum the exact
example which Maimonides cites (since I am paraphrasing from memory),
yet my example is very similar to his example. Maimonides makes the
point that God does not intervene anywhere in this slap-stick, Rube
Goldberg example of a chain of cause and effect.

Maimonides sees the created universe as something set in motion by God,
operating by its own laws and principles, much like the comical Enigizer
Bunny which we see in the Duracell battery commercials.

Many Centuries earlier, the writings of King Solomon, Ecclesiastes,
Chapter 9, Verse 11, confirmed the validity of Maimonide's notion when
he writes: "I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the
swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet
riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time
and chance happeneth to them all.

Modern Orthodox Rabinnical thought agrees with Maimonides that God
only intervenes in causality in the form of "Divine Overflow' in the life of a
Zadek or righteous man.

But if we look back to our passage in Deuteronomy about the rain and the
snow and their analogy to the "Words" which God sends into the world to
accomplish a certain work, we may see some agreement and
comfirmation of Maimonides understanding of the role which God plays in
causality.

Jesus said to "search the scriptures" (the words of God) for "therein we
whall find Eternal Life", but Jesus does not point to any particular chaper
and verse. When the two Apostles say to Jesus "Where do you live", He
replies "come and see" (an invitation to a subjective experience) but
Jesus does not give a street address. Jesus tells one man "You are not far
form the Kingdom" but Jesus does not say how far or give a longitude
and latitude for the Kingdom's location.

What we see, I suspect, is the invitation to a subjective individual
dialectical experience.

Rabbi Kook, the first Ashkenazie Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, quotes a Rabbi
of old, Nahman from Bratslav regarding the 3rd chapter of Malachai
(which is the last book of the Old Testament). The verse in Chapter 3:16
of Malachi reads: "“Those who feared the Lord spoke to one another, and
the Lord listened and heard them. A book of remembrance was written
before Him for those who fear the Lord and who meditate on His Name.”

The Rabbi Nahman of Bratslav comments that "Two men who live in
different places, or even in different generations, may still converse. For
one may raise a question, and the other who is far away in time or space
may make a comment or ask a question that answers it. So they
converse, but no one knows it save the Lord, who hears and records and
brings together all the words of men, as it is written: "They who serve the
Lord speak to one another, and the Lord hears them and records their
words in His Book" (Mal.3.16)

This is the Talmudic dialectical process.

Rabbi Nachman of Breslov (1772-1810 C.E.)

The great-grandson of the Baal Shem Tov, Rabbi Nachman of Breslov
(sometimes called Bratzlav, Breslau or Bratislava) was the founder of the
Breslover Chasidic sect. Breslov is a town in the Ukraine where Rabbi
Nachman spent the end of his life, but some say the name Breslov comes
from the Hebrew bris lev, meaning "covenant of the heart." He
emphasized living life with joy and happiness. One of his best-known
sayings is, "It is a great mitzvah to be happy." Collections of his Chasidic
tales (or tales attributed to him) are widely available in print.

In Genesis, we see that at the end of each day of creation, God looks and
sees that "It is GOOD". But when the entire work of creation is finally
completed, God looks and sees that "it is VERY GOOD". Jewish tradition
sees within this "very good" the "yetzer harah", the natural human
tendency or inclination towards evil which may be spiritually harnessed as
an energy and redirected towards GOOD. For example, the man with a
tendency towards greed may become greedy for Torah knowledge or
spiritual wisdom.

R. Nahman said in R. Samuel's name: BEHOLD, IT WAS VERY GOOD
refers to the Good Desire; AND BEHOLD, IT WAS VERY GOOD, to the Evil
Desire. Can then the Evil Desire be very good? That would be
extraordinary! But for the Evil Desire, however, no man would build a
house, take a wife and beget children; and thus said Solomon:

"Again, I considered all labour and all excelling in work, that it is a man's
rivalry with his neighbour." (Koheleth/Ecclesiastes IV, 4)

The translators have rendered yetzer hara literally, as "evil desire," but as
a recurring concept from classic texts, I would think of it as "selfish" or
"egocentric" rather than "evil" in its ordinary sense. Thus the midrash
works something like this: all of creation is "good" in that it fits together in
a harmonious scheme, and is beautiful, bountiful, and reflective of its
Source. Basing itself on two textual variations from the other days- the
"and" and the "very" - R. Nahman points out that humans have an extra
or additional aspect, different from the rest of creation. We have the
capacity to be altruistic or selfish, good or evil, generous or stingy. Human
beings are neither inherently good nor bad, but are given the impulse
and desire for either direction.

If the midrash stopped there, we'd have a fairly straightforward point:
humans possess a moral consciousness that animals don't, and are thus
morally responsible for our choices. R. Nahman, however, goes a step
further, and points out that things that we might think of as self-centred
can actually produce great things. The human drive for achievement
might be based in ego, but without it, the world would be poorer.

R. Nahman in his example is acknowledging that human relationships
contain elements of both selfishness and selflessness; perhaps he is even
suggesting that without the personal satisfaction of intimate relationships,
the hard work and emotional struggle just wouldn't be worth it for many
people.

R. Nahman is certainly also challenging the views of those religions that
posit poverty and celibacy as the spiritual ideal- in his midrash, God
directly approves of personal fulfillment in worldly relationships. Again,
this is not about hedonism, but balance. No reasonable reading of Jewish
sources would produce the idea that personal, self-centred fulfillment is
the ultimate goal of life. On the other hand, this reading of the story of
Creation seems to teach us that we are meant to enjoy life and find it
good. Hard things can happen, but the challenge is to see the world
through God's eyes, making the choices and connections that raise the
material world, which is good, to the level of spiritual fulfillment, which can
be "very good" indeed.

From the Sufi's, we read the following:

"What is Fate?" Nasrudin was asked by a scholar.

Nasrudin answered: "An endless succession of intertwined events, each
influencing the other."

The scholar objected, "That is hardly a satisfactory answer. I believe in
cause and effect."

"Very well," said Nasrudin, "look at that." He pointed to a procession
passing in the street."That man is being taken to be hanged. Is that
because someone gave him a silver piece and enabled him to buy the
knife with which he committed the murder or because someone saw him
do it or because nobody stopped him?"

The above is from Sufi stories about the wise fool Mulla Nasrudin. The
Sufis believe that intuition is the only real guide to knowledge and use
these stories as exercises. The stories can be applied to many different
situations, The source for the Sufi stories is Indries Shah's The
Pleasantries of the Incredible Mulla Nasrudin (ARKANA Penguin Books,
reprint edition 1993).

On page one of Hans Kung's work "On Being Christian", Kung raises a
profound question:

“Why should one be a Christian? Why not be human, truly human? Why,
in addition to being human, should we be Christian? Is there something
more to being a christian than to being human?”

I might paraphrase Kung’s words by asking “What is there to prevent us
from leading good, humane lives if the Gospels had never been written
and we had no knowledge of Christ?”

The psychologist Alfred Adler was once asked by a student during a
question period, after one of his lectures, “And what of God, Dr. Adler?
What are your thoughts on God and Religion?” Adler simply replied, “I
would hope that, if there is a God, that he would approve of the manner in
which I have conducted my life.”

It has been said of Dietrich Bonhoeffer that during the last years of his
life, he became increasingly concerned with the aquestion, “What does
Christ mean in our life TODAY, right NOW?”

Dietrich Bonhoeffer was safe in America, but chose to put his life in
jeopardy by returning to Nazi Germany, and there met a martyr’s death
after his unsuccessful attempt to stop Hitler. Social activism and protest
was not a part of the Lutheran tradition in which Bonhoeffer had been
raised.

"Only he who believes is obedient, and only he who is obedient believes."

"Cheap grace is the deadly enemy of our church. We are fighting today
for costly grace. Cheap grace means grace sold on the market like the
cheapjack¹s wares. Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without
requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion
without confession, absolution without personal confession. Cheap grace is
grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus
Christ, living and incarnate."

--Quotes from Bonhoeffer's The Cost of Discipleship, first published in
1937.

By the way, Hans Kung ends his 600 page book, “On Being Christian”,
with these words:

So we have asked: why should one be a Christian? The answer will
certainly be understood now if we reduce it to a brief recapitulatory
formula:

By following Jesus Christ,
man in the world of today
can truly humanly live, act,
suffer and die:
in happiness and unhappiness,
life and death,
sustained by God
and helpful to men.

Get your own free IRC Chat room